Hi @521xueweihan, an automated scan of this repository surfaced 10 code-quality findings that may be worth a look. Full details, severity filters, and per-file context are at the link below — feel free to close this issu…
Hi @521xueweihan, an automated scan of this repository surfaced 10 code-quality findings that may be worth a look. Full details, severity filters, and per-file context are at the link below — feel free to close this issue if it isn't useful to you. Full interactive report At a glance Score: 85/100 • Grade: B Scanned: 2026-05-17 20:09 UTC Lines of code: 313 Total findings: 10 Security-tagged: 9 Credential / secret patterns: 0 Top issues, with file & line These are deterministic rule-based findings — the file paths and line numbers below are real and can be verified in your tree. 1. [high] [SEC013] Path Traversal — User Input in File Path: User-controlled input used in file path without sanitization. Allows reading arbitrary files. — script/makecontent/makecontent.py:45 Use os.path.realpath() and verify the path starts with your expected base directory. Use securefilename() for uploads. 2. [low] No LICENSE file Add a LICENSE file to your repository. Use choosealicense.com to pick the right license (MIT for permissive, Apache 2.0 for patent protection, GPL for copyleft). 3. [medium] Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell — content/HelloGitHub102.md:195 Agent helper projects often publish one-line installers. curl | sh style commands are convenient, but they bypass review unless the script is pinned, signed, or checksum-verif… 4. [medium] Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell — content/HelloGitHub29.md:39 Agent helper projects often publish one-line installers. curl | sh style commands are convenient, but they bypass review unless the script is pinned, signed, or checksum-verif… 5. [medium] Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell — content/HelloGitHub50.md:55 Agent helper projects often publish one-line installers. curl | sh style commands are convenient, but they bypass review unless the script is pinned, signed, or checksum-verif… See all 10 findings, with severity filters and AI fix prompts: What is this? Repobility is a research project that scans public repositories with a multi-layer static analyzer (rule-based, no AI hallucinations) and learns code-quality patterns across a broad cross-repo corpus. This is not a sales pitch — there's no paywall, no signup required to view the report, and no payment ask. If the findings aren't useful, please close this issue and we won't post again. To re-run after fixes land: paste your repo URL at repobility.com — fresh scan, free. Issue filed via the public Repobility report at
讨论这个产品